U.S. Nuclear Weapons and Weapon Programs Essay Example for Free

U.S. atomic Weapons and Weapon Programs Essaydissertation Statement Replacing the Stockpile Stewardship Program (SSP) with the Reliable Replacement Warhead Program (RRW) may facilitate existing issues concerning the long-run reliability, dependablety, security, and manufacturing of U. S. weapons. However, the RRW has been cancelled due to the overwhelming concern of long-term funds to maintain RRW and Democrats savour as though the RRW is not a proven technology (GlobalSecurity. org). However, the RRW should be utilise as a motive not to continue atomic testing.Currently, the SSP consists of worn weapons that are costly to maintain and are open(a)ed to impedance testing (Boyer 303). Implementing the RRW will bring home the bacon cost-efficient and reliable weapons that are manufactured to last with fewer obligations to nuclear underground testing. Implementing the RRW would be a good investment for this reason alone. Overall, replacing the SSP with the RRW will establ ish untested cost-efficient weapons with little maintenance that are little prone to underground nuclear testing provide state-of-the art technology to protect the U. S.from terrorists intrusions such as hacking and unauthorized usage, and create an efficient regularity for securing the decreasing stockpile. 1) Long Term Reliability of U. S Weapons. The maintenance of refurbished weapons may become more than(prenominal) compound due to aging. The RRW addresses this issue by implementing untried weapons that are cost-efficient and unhazardous thus providing reliable and safe weapons for the U. S. harmonize to the article, A New Nuclear Warhead, The RRW is committed to the smallest nuclear stockpile consistent with our security to safe, posit and reliable weapons and to the current nuclear testing moratorium. Refurbished weapons tend to need more maintenance and are subject to nuclear underground testing. 2) The Safety and Security of U. S. Weapons. The SSP may not be suff icient to meet coming(prenominal) tendencys pertaining to the safety and security of U. S Weapons. In the article, Reliable Replacement Warhead, RRW aims to make US nuclear weapons safer and more secure against unauthorized use by incorporating state-of-the-art security features that cannot be retrofitted to older weapons.The ultimate goal is to transition to a smaller, more responsive nuclear infrastructure that will enable future administrations to queue the US nuclear stockpile as geopolitical conditions warrant. (26) 3) Maintenance of Existing Weapons may become more expensive with the SSP. Refurbished weapons require more maintenance than newer weapons thus requiring additional funds to sustain current conditions of the weapons. According to the Department of Defense news release, Kenneth Krieg states that the implementation of the RRW will reduce stockpile size by permitting new weapons with less maintenance.Newer weapons will need less maintenance and in return will be le ss applicable to additional funding. Members of the Nuclear Weapons Council are confident that incorporating the RRW will permit a more compulsive and cost-effective infrastructure by employing improved computational and experimental tools to administer the technical base (U. S. strategical Command 1). 4) Implementing the New RRW Plan. The RRW intends to implement newer U. S weapons with higher-performance ratings and advance safety and security features while providing a less expensive maintenance plan.After examining the article in Bulletin of Atomic Scientist, the RRW is aimed at accomplishing a more cost effective and efficient method of securing the decreasing stockpile to be more reliable and safe (Drell 48). Incorporating the RRW will provide the tools necessary to ensure that nuclear underground testing is less likely to be required for future designs (A divergent Kind of Complex 1). Conclusion Unfortunately, the RRW has been cancelled due to the overwhelming concerns of long-term funds to maintain RRW and Democrats feel as though the RRW is not a proven technology.However, the RRW should be used as a motive not to continue nuclear testing. Implementing the RRW will alleviate the SSP of existing issues concerning the long-term reliability, safety, security and manufacturing of U. S weapons that are less prone to underground nuclear testing. Overall, RRW will serve as a solution to the ongoing concerns of underground nuclear testing.Works CitedArm Control Association. A Different Kind of Complex The Future of U. S. Weapons and the Nuclear Weapons Enterprise. (1997-2009) 3 serve 2009 http//www.armscontrol. org/print/3454 A New Nuclear Warhead. (Editorial Desk)(Letter to the editor). The New York Times. (30 Jan 2007) A20(L). Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Apollo Library. 3 Mar. 2009 http//find. galegroup. com/ovrc/infomark. do? contentSet=IAC-Documentstype=retrievetabID=T004prodId=OVRCdocId=A158559391source=galeuserGroupName=uphoenixversi on=1. 0 Boyer, Paul S. Nuclear Weapons. The Oxford Companion to the join States History. Oxford University Press. (2001) 303 Department of Defense news release.(2March 2007) Reliable Replacement Warhead Design Decision Announced http//find. galegroup. com/itx/start. do? prodId=ITOF Global Security for America. U. S. Strategic Commands Supports RRW Strategy. (2007) 2 March 2007 http//www. stratcom. mil/default. asp? page=newsarticle=14 GlobalSecuirty. org. Weapons of pack Destruction. Reliable Replacement Warhead. (2009) 11 March 2009 http//www. globalsecurity. org/wmd/systems/rrw. htm Interavia Business and Technology. Reliable Replacement Warhead. (2007) 3 March 2009 http//find. galegroup. com/itx/start. do? prodId=ITOF