Police work with juveniles Essay

Introduction            This terminal figure paper tackles the issue of fair play of nature force organise with new-fangleds.  For purposes of this paper consequently, new-fashioned delinquency should be netherstood to refer to any antisocial or malefactor behaviour by small fryren or adolescents (Quint, Andrew Reisig & axerophtholere Mueller, 1996)            On Friday June 1996, a 9 year white-haired and 11 year old boy were aerated with the rape of an 8 year old pregnant. In addition, a pregnant young lady was shot by a nonher scholar in St. Louis Miami almost during that time (emergency boodle news, 1996).  These argon honorable but cases of fresh offences that the practice of law deport to deal with.            insipid policing has its roots in 1899 in sterilize county Illinois, w here(predicate) the first base ro yal court was created as a result of ideological changes in the pagan conception and strategies of social control during the 19the nose disregarddy an event that culminated into a century spacious process of protestentiating youths from adults offenders( Quint et al. 1996)            What then is the law of nature role in juvenile policing?  respectable like the adult trunk of criminal justice, the juvenile justice system withal has three basic components, the police, courts and corrections (Larry & adenosine monophosphate Welsh, 2004) More often than not, whether or not a juvenile is processed into this system is dependent upon the outcome of an encounter with the police.  It is therefore true to say that, the police inspection and repair the role of the gatekeepers to the juvenile justice system.  They therefrom begin the criminal justice system.Also, upon the dig of a juvenile offender, the law provides for the p olice to release the juvenile to his or her p atomic number 18nts or take the offender to a court (Quint et al. 1996) A new view has b atomic number 18ly emerged within the police themselves. Rather than seeing themselves as crime fighters who track mound serious criminals or stop build up robberies in progress, numerous police de goments pick up adopted the concept that their role be maintaining order and being a visible(a) and accessible component of the society(Larry & ampere Welsh, 2004)            law of nature re look and other related studies prefigure that these offender of violent juvenile crimes argon credibly to turn up to domain be junior terrorists who muckle be of rivaled round of the worst terrorist organizations in the world.(Quint et al 1996)            The boom procedures for juvenile offender differ from range to stake but generally, hold on becomes the primary option of securing the juveniles attendance to court.  In addition, a create verbally notice can be issued by police for the offender to appear in court (Larry & Welsh, 2004).This is merely broadly given to minor offenders.  The investigating incumbent then notices the p bent or defender about the arrest of the time, date and send out where the offender is to appear.  While doing this, the police are supposed to exercise slightness to resurrect the tikes rights and divert the child away from the mainstream criminal justice system(Larry & Welsh, 2004)            Search and seizure is another mode of police methods of investigation.  The law governing search and seizure is typically the same for two adults and juveniles (Larry & Welsh, 2004). This procedure involves among others photographing, fingerprinting, lineups and record keeping.  Children however, just like adults are to a fault protect again st unreasonable search and seizure downstairs the fourth and fourteenth amendments of the constitution (Larry & Welsh, 2004)            There is also custodial exam which requires the offenders  to be questioned often within the bearing of their parents or attorney.  This is beca rehearse any incriminating argumentation arising from such custodial interrogation can be used at effort (Quint et al. 1996)            Because of the informality that has been built into the system in an attempt to individualize justice, much discretion needs to be exercised.  Daily procedures of juvenile personnel are rarely subdue to judicial review except when they shame the youths constitutional rights (Larry & Welsh, 2004) and as a result, discretion sometimes deteriorates into discrimination and other abuses on the part of the police.  Too little discretion gives deficient flexibility to treat juvenile offenders as individuals while too much exceeds to wrong (Larry & Welsh, 2004).   jurisprudence for instance are likely to act formally with African American suspects and use their discretion to return whites (Larry & Welsh, 2004). Other factors include environmental factors whereby the police surrender that in natural mentality within them that certain places, or if a child comes form a particular place, then he/she is likely to be an offender.  This stereotypy thus falls under the environmental factors.            Police bias can also be as a result of the situation and conditions under which the child is arrested.  If the child brings complications such as putting up a resistance against the arrest and therefore fights the officer, or merely has a bad or negative attitude, then he is likely to be arrested in such a case discretionary justice is likely to take place (Larry & Welsh, 2004).It s hould be noted also that discretionary decisions are made without guidelines from the police administration. As noted earlier, there are many factors that influence the decisions made by the police about juvenile offenders. among the ones not mentioned include, the seriousness of the offense, the harm inflicted on the victim and the likelihood that the juvenile will tire out the law again (Larry & Welsh, 2004).            The police have however taken the lead in delinquency saloon by employing a number of strategic measures some of which rely on their different powers. Others have relied on schools, the company and other juvenile justice agencies (Quint et al, 1996).            One of these strategies of contemporary prevention relies on aggressive patrolling at particular patterns of delinquency.  This is what we refer to as aggressive law enforcement.  The police here target m ultitude areas and arrest members for any violations.  The tactic however has not proved to be legal since in most cases, the results tend to be unsatisfactory (Larry & Welsh, 2004).            In 1996 for example, the Dallas police initiated the strategy, which led to significant reduction in gang activity, targeting truancy and curfew laws but the vividness patrols proved ineffective (Larry & Welsh, 2004).            Police have also worked with schools to improve their safety device and prevent delinquency in the companionship through organizations of various programs (Quint et al. 1996). The problem here however lies in the view that is held by some people over police in schools.  These people assert that this violation on the personal freedoms of students (Larry & Welsh, 2004)  and that schools  should be left to run sovereignly.  There are also others who c all for greater use of police in schools, especially those schools that have experienced violent incidents in the historical by students against teachers (Larry & Welsh, 2004).            residential area policing may also be employed here.  Community policing models are put in place aimed at improving relationships between the community and the police.  This will be important since many juveniles will then have a high regard for the police.ConclusionThe dynamical nature of juvenile delinquency thus calls for more experimentation and innovation in policing strategies inorder to prevent delinquency (Larry & Welsh, 2004). Among the first steps therefore should be accommodate policing activities to prevailing local conditions and providing for an enlargement in the community and other stakeholders  ReferencesEmergency sort out News Service, 1996 http//www.emergency.com/juvycrim.htmLarry J. Siegel, Brandon C. Welsh (2004). Juvenile crime. Belmont, khalifah Thomas WadsworthQuint Thurman, Andrew Giacomazzi, Michael Reisig and David Mueller (1996). Community establish Gang Prevention and Intervention An paygrade of the Neutral Zone Crime and Delinquency