'David Thomas- The Mind Of A Man Essay\r'

'During persuasive writing pieces authors try to advert you see their get of tidy sum as valid. a lot times during this process, their writing is via mediad by the errors they construct to conjure up their order. David doubting doubting Thomas acquires m each errors in his essay â€Å"The sound judgwork forcet of a Man.” In his thesis he tries to examine that women argon not smarter than men as antecedently believed, but instead that they just now when excel at several(predicate) tasks. However, throughout his whole essay, he describes that boys are discour termd by distaff teachers and does not have to his thesis. He maneuvered a biased point of view that he take overed with only anecdotical prove and studies that contained no totals or statistics. Also, his use of feeling in his essay showed his anger towards others views that contradicted his.\r\nDavid Thomas retains a biased point of view in his essay. end-to-end many parts of the essay he descr ibes the stereotypes closely boys, stating their difficulty to learn properly as a result of these stereotypes by often using anecdotical evidence. He describes the bring low grades boys were getting than girls on the GCSE exams and makes the assumption, â€Å"The instauration of course work into the GCSE syllabus appears to favor girls, who bleed to be diligent and less(prenominal) rebellious,” which has not been proven, or could not be backed up by any sort of statistical or existent information from studies. He makes this avowal assuming that the agent must be that girls receive higher grades because the mental test favored them. He does not take into the love that maybe the boys just didn’t do as sound for a number of other flat coats that has nought to do with the way the tests were designed.\r\nIn the essay, he continues to show his biased point of view by quoting Tony Mooney, a secondary instill headmaster, who reinforces his point reflexion boys a re less advanced than girls because women teachers favor girls and do not reinforce boys because of their â€Å"aggressive” and â€Å"boisterous” behavior. Thomas adds this quote that has no concomitantual evidence, it is the opinion of a school headmaster, who surely cannot be present everyday in every single class to know everything that’s going on. Thomas quotes Mooney’s son, who showed a disagreement in his marks when taught by a woman, â€Å"Because the men teachers never shout at me as such(prenominal) as the woman teachers” is another form of anecdotic evidence. This is the feeling of one little boy who cannot be compared to society as a whole (222).\r\nThomas continues to try and prove his point by adding studies without any statistics in them and in turn makes many contradictions to things antecedently mentioned in his essay. He includes a hear make at the University of California in which 72 boys and 60 girls at kindergarten level learned how to read with a machine. When tested, the girls scores were less than the boys scores. Then, when they went back to normal bid by women teachers, they were tested again later and the boys scored less than the girls.\r\nAs interesting as these results may be, they do not contain numbers to show how large-mouthed the difference actually was. The difference could be stripped which could be due to a number of reasons. So, the particular that no statistical evidence was included with the saucilys report did not prove to be that convincing (223). Also, in the inducening of the essay, he states that women have been proven to be bump at verbal tasks, which would explain the reason why they didn’t do as well with the machines as the teachers. So he contradicts himself entering this study by previously showing why a girl might have done better on these tests (221).\r\nThomas uses a lot of emotion in his essay to prove his point, specifically when he talks about the q uote he apply from Christine Cosker who seemed to disprove one of his earlier quotes by Mooney. She said, â€Å"If girls chance upon higher standards than boys, it is not the result of sympathetic womanish teachers: it is that boys fail to be motivated because of their attitude to women. son’s early experience is almost altogether one of a society which regards women’s traditionalistic roles as trivial, dull and second-rate and dismisses their opinions. If girls have a positive role precedent in the young-bearing(prenominal) teacher, they will do better than boys. But if boys, unmortgaged by society’s prejudices, valued their female teachers, then their progress would match that of girls”(223). Obviously Cosker tangle strongly about her point and proved an option explanation to Mooneys as well as Thomas’ theory of female teachers being the cause of the boys lour grades. Thomas uses sarcasm as well to make his anger known.\r\nIn reaction to her letter, he states â€Å" promised land forbid that they [boys] should be given any contemplation or compassion. Heaven forbid that the prejudices of the new age should be challenged. If you ever doubted that feminists have taken all over from apoplectic old colonels as the great reactionaries of society, just read this letter”(224). If you read surrounded by the lines of his sarcasm, you begin to see just what he is implying. He is implying that she didn’t give boys any compassion or consideration when she was alone stating that if the boys learned to appreciate their teachers more and see them as more of a role model it would work towards their advantage. He continues to attack her different point of view by stating them as a â€Å"feminists” point of view. In his efforts to try to make people take his side and believe his thoughts he just discredits himself because instead of embracing the possibility of other causes he only knocks them down and s tates that they are just plain and simply wrong.\r\nThomas’ body paragraphs and conclusion were not committed substantially to the main point of his essay. In his thesis, he used a quote from Dr. John Nicholson saying that the IQ scores from men and women were â€Å"indistinguishable” (221), and the only difference is that they were just better at different sort of tasks. Meanwhile, his whole entire essay attacked the fact that female teachers don’t support the boys and that caused their lower grades. So the information he provided did not support his thesis.\r\nAlso he ends the conclusion with a hostile statement that seem to signify a new thesis. His concluding sentence, â€Å"When Yoda sat on his rock in The Empire Strikes Back and told Luke Skywalker that he had to choose between the dark force and the light, he knew what he was public lecture about” (225), seemed to make little sense and had goose egg to do with his essay. In writing his essay, he should’ve considered his consultation and that some people who did not see the photographic film would not understand what he was implying, besides that statement seemed more like an opening line preferably than a concluding one.\r\nIn order for authors to make you see their point of view as valid, they sometimes compromise the strength of their information. David Thomas did many things to compromise his credibility in his essay â€Å"The Mind of a Man.” In Thomas’ essay he had a biased view that he supported with anecdotal evidence. He used studies with no real number or statistics to verify them. His use of emotion in his essay showed his anger towards others views that contradicted his. Also, his body paragraphs and conclusion didn’t seem to be connected to the initial thesis he stated.\r\n'