Problem 1: Is there sufficient evidence from these samples to direct up that the amount of sugar in a food grain smear is unalike or cereals placed on unlike shelves in the store? 1 1.Â Â Â Â Â Â Ho: Âµ1=Âµ2=Âµ3 Ha: at least one is different 2.Â Â Â Â Â Â A) conditions: * The histogram for shelf 1 does not egress to be normal. * The histogram for ledge 2 does not appear to be normal. * The histogram for shelf 3 does not appear to be normal. The histograms for shelf 1, 2, and 3 do not appear to be normal, just this is explained by the blue sample size. * The boxplots do not flourish that there outliers. B) testing statistic: f = 6.60(megastat) Â 3.Â Â Â Â Â Â P-value of 6.60 = .0023 (megastat); which is statistically significant Â 4.Â Â Â Â Â Â Reject H0: at .01 since .0023 < .01 Â 5.Â Â Â Â Â Â At least one shelf holds cereal brands whose call up sugar content is different from the early(a) shelves. | | | | | | | ANOVA parry| | | | | | | rise| SS| df| MS| F| p-value| | Treatment| 220.23 | 2| 110.117 | 6.60| .0023| | actus reus| 1,217.71 | 73| 16.681 | | | | tot up| 1,437.95 | 75| Â | Â | Â | | 2 1.Â Â Â Â Â Â Ho: ui=uj Ha: ui?uj Â 2. A. Conditions: shown above 3.
Â Â ledge two holds brands whose mean sugar content is different from the other(a) shelves based on all the f statistics in the Tukey table. ?????????????Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â shelf 2 is different than shelf 1 at the .01 moment level ?????????????Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ledge 2 is different than shelf 3 at the .05 significance level * ledge 2! has a going away from Shelf 1 of 4.2 for sugar content. * Shelf 2 has a difference from Shelf 3 of 3.1 for sugar content. ?Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Shelf 1 and shelf 3 are not significantly different Â Post hocÂ abstract| | | | Tukey simultaneous comparing t-values (d.f. = 73)| | | shelf 1| shelf 3| shelf 2| | | 5.1| 6.5| 9.6| shelf 1| 5.1| Â | Â | Â | shelf 3| 6.5| 1.23| Â | Â |...If you want to hold back a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper